Since this came up again recently, in several mediums, it’s an important topic to talk about.
I do not identify as a person with autism.
I also definitely don’t suffer from autism, so if you think that you are totally on the wrong blog.
I’m working on my Master’s right now and even when I submit papers, my teacher will try to correct me. “People are more than their disability” the red notes in the margin say. Oh yeah, I’m more than autism but autism is me. Autism affects my daily life, like it or not. The only time I’ll say I’m living with autism is in reference to creatures I live with, humans or felines.
I choose to use identity-first language and this is a conscious move on my part and the part of many other self-advocates. When I get politely told off by parents and professionals for saying “River Tam is autistic”, those are the little moments where I get to try to have a teachable moment. Would you say a “person of Italian heritage” or would you simply say an Italian? How about “a person with homosexual tendencies”? We teach educators and professionals to use person first language, but like gender identity, how about we ask they person how they would like to be identified. Let’s not make assumptions because of how a person looks or how they behave.
There are many different branches in the disability population who do prefer person-first language over identity-first. Again, I am speaking specifically about the autism community. Personally I’ll respond to being called pretty much anything, but there may be an eye roll if the phrase is really condescending. The point is; it is our choice on how we want to present ourselves to the world and the significance of our word choices. For decades it was parents and professionals speaking out and advocating for the autistic community. We have now found a voice and should be respected for the things we have to say.
Autistic is not a dirty word.
It is a strong word.